quatrelle87
Enthusiast
- Messages
- 102
- Location
- Eymoutiers, France
My search for a 4L continues - it's taken me from a 1988 TL, to a 1987 F4, to a 1968 4L and on to a 1988 TL Savane. At the moment, I'm trying to weigh up the pros and cons for the '68 4L and the '88 Savane.
The car will be used maybe twice a week, perhaps more, for mainly local journeys - with the occasional longer drive to car shows, weekends away, etc. It'll have the occasional 80km round trip to the DIY store, as well as having to nip around the bendy roads here in the Limousin.
The '68 4L, 6v, is a lovely car and in very good condition - solid chassis, floor and panels, although some of the paintwork is suspect where scratches have been resprayed badly.
The '88 Savane is also in very good condition - solid and very well cared for, although some rust repairs have been carried out and you never really know what is hiding beneath. However, there were no advisories on the last CT.
For what I'd use it for, the Savane makes more sense - it has a tow hook, a more powerful engine, and would probably be easier to maintain (not necessarily?). But the '68 4L is such a laugh to drive, with the gear changes like those of a 2CV, etc.
Sorry to ramble on. I want to try and make a decision this coming week so I can begin my relationship with the great R4. Any thoughts or advice would be very welcome!
:?
The car will be used maybe twice a week, perhaps more, for mainly local journeys - with the occasional longer drive to car shows, weekends away, etc. It'll have the occasional 80km round trip to the DIY store, as well as having to nip around the bendy roads here in the Limousin.
The '68 4L, 6v, is a lovely car and in very good condition - solid chassis, floor and panels, although some of the paintwork is suspect where scratches have been resprayed badly.
The '88 Savane is also in very good condition - solid and very well cared for, although some rust repairs have been carried out and you never really know what is hiding beneath. However, there were no advisories on the last CT.
For what I'd use it for, the Savane makes more sense - it has a tow hook, a more powerful engine, and would probably be easier to maintain (not necessarily?). But the '68 4L is such a laugh to drive, with the gear changes like those of a 2CV, etc.
Sorry to ramble on. I want to try and make a decision this coming week so I can begin my relationship with the great R4. Any thoughts or advice would be very welcome!
:?